CIRC lobbies for insurers’ right to buy China’s first ABS
China’s insurance regulator is considering allowing mainland insurers to buy asset-backed securities (ABS) issued by two Chinese banks slated to go on sale in September, Hong Kong's local English-language newspaper has reported.
“If the CIRC successfully lobbies for insurers to buy the securities in the upcoming pilot programme, China Life would be keen to do so,” the paper quoted vice-president Liu Jiade of China Life Insurance as saying.
Trial rules for loan securitisation were issued on April 20 by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and the banking regulator, the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC).
A month earlier, the PBOC had given the go-ahead to two pilot securitisation schemes – one mortgage-backed deal from China Construction Bank, which is working with Standard Chartered and law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer; and one collateralised loan obligation of infrastructure loans from China Development Bank, which is being advised by Lehman Brothers and consultants Deloitte Touche.
Both banks won approval to securitise assets worth RMB10 billion ($1.2 billion). The first tranches of the two ABS deals are expected to go on sale next month, the report added.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack