Chinese regulator extends derivatives transition period
The China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) has extended the transition period for its new derivatives licensing regime, giving banks an extra three months to get licences in place that will allow them to trade derivatives onshore.
“Some departments received a lot of applications,” said Li Fuan, CBRC deputy director-general of the supervisory rules and regulatory policy department in Beijing. “For officers to review these and make proper evaluations will take time.”
A slew of banks have applied to their local CBRC branches for licences since the new regulations came into force. The CBRC needs to approve the application at the local level and in its Beijing headquarters.
The new regulations allow licensed local and foreign banks to trade derivatives on their own accounts for profit – previously they were only allowed to use them to hedge. Licensed foreign banks will also be able to do business with domestic corporate clients onshore. Previously, foreign banks were permitted to trade only with Chinese financial institutions.
Banks that have so far been given the go-ahead include ABN Amro, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Citigroup, Credit Suisse First Boston, Mizuho Bank and Standard Chartered. Others such as Deutsche Bank, HSBC and JP Morgan Chase are still waiting.
Feng Gao, Deutsche Bank’s co-head of global markets for China, says he is hopeful the bank will be given the green light “soon”. And an HSBC spokesperson in Hong Kong said, “The CBRC Shanghai Branch has approved our application and we’re awaiting approval from the CBRC head office in Beijing.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation