Wells Fargo posts $2.55 billion loss in Q4
Hampered by its move to bolster credit loss reserves, Wells Fargo saw a $2.55 billion loss in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Over 2008, Wells Fargo built up its reserves against credit losses by $8.14 billion to $21.7 billion, which it estimates covers 12 months of predicted losses on consumer loans and 24 months of predicted losses on commercial and commercial real estate loans.
Its acquisition of Wachovia, which was completed on December 31, also damped results, swinging to a $11.17 billion loss in the quarter. Wells Fargo has taken measures to unwind the risk on Wachovia's balance sheet, by writing down $37.2 billion in high-risk loans on its loan portfolio.
On October 29, Wells Fargo received a $25 billion capital injection from the US Treasury in exchange for 25,000 shares of preferred stock via the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program. Wells Fargo also stated that it would not request a second capital injection. Other banks have not fared as well, with Bank of America asking for a second government bail-out after suffering from heavier-than-expected losses after its acquisition of Merrill Lynch.
Wells Fargo's move to unwind balance-sheet risk pushed its tier-one capital ratio lower in the quarter - it stood at 7.9% at the close of the year, down from its September 30 level of 8.58%.
Commenting on steps the bank has taken to reduce balance sheet risk, chief financial officer Howard Atkins stated in a conference call: "While these actions and other significant items resulted in reported losses at both banks in the fourth quarter, the balance sheet of the combined organization was strengthened and the resultant 'de-risked' capital position of the new organisation remains strong."
See also: JP Morgan Q4 net income plunges 74%
Citi hit by $8.9 billion Q4 loss, splits company
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions