US SEC to begin work on Basel II rules
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will soon issue a set of proposals, consisting of rule amendments and new rules, to create two separate voluntary regulatory frameworks for the supervision of broker-dealers and their affiliates on a consolidated basis, according to an announcement on Wednesday.
The other proposal would provide a Basel II framework for the consolidated supervision of holding companies of broker-dealers, also known as ‘investment bank holding companies’. These entities would have to apply to be supervised by the SEC, and would be subject to supervision by the SEC of the firms’ record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The SEC has come in for heavy criticism during the past few months from regulators and banks around the world. Until the advent of these new rule proposals, it seemed possible that US investment banks would not be subject to the new Basel II proposals for banking supervision. The SEC had not been part of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and had not supervised the banks that it oversaw on a consolidated basis. As a result, firms such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley would have been forced to comply with Basel II in Europe, but not at their US headquarters.
European banks, which believed this would place them at a competitive disadvantage, were vocal in their criticism of US regulatory authorities. They were joined by European regulators, which argued that US authorities needed to apply Basel II to the large investment banks as well behind closed doors.
The comment period for this document will start as soon as it is published in full in the Federal Register. It will last for 90 days.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision