US SEC to begin work on Basel II rules
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will soon issue a set of proposals, consisting of rule amendments and new rules, to create two separate voluntary regulatory frameworks for the supervision of broker-dealers and their affiliates on a consolidated basis, according to an announcement on Wednesday.
The other proposal would provide a Basel II framework for the consolidated supervision of holding companies of broker-dealers, also known as ‘investment bank holding companies’. These entities would have to apply to be supervised by the SEC, and would be subject to supervision by the SEC of the firms’ record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The SEC has come in for heavy criticism during the past few months from regulators and banks around the world. Until the advent of these new rule proposals, it seemed possible that US investment banks would not be subject to the new Basel II proposals for banking supervision. The SEC had not been part of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and had not supervised the banks that it oversaw on a consolidated basis. As a result, firms such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley would have been forced to comply with Basel II in Europe, but not at their US headquarters.
European banks, which believed this would place them at a competitive disadvantage, were vocal in their criticism of US regulatory authorities. They were joined by European regulators, which argued that US authorities needed to apply Basel II to the large investment banks as well behind closed doors.
The comment period for this document will start as soon as it is published in full in the Federal Register. It will last for 90 days.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB revamp won’t restore models to past glory, risk managers say
US-inspired reform only expected to lead to small boost in adoption, with limited desks on IMA
Regulators must think bigger to tackle tech risks, says Hong Kong SFC
Leung warns AI adoption and recent cyber scares show new threats require global co-operation
Time to let some air out of the banking system?
Watchdogs worry about lowering standards, but policy-makers eye growth – they face a difficult dilemma
Competitiveness mandate for Esma faces uphill battle
European Parliament offers last chance to force Esma to take more nuanced approach
Europe expects FRTB to bite on XVA hedges
Risk Benchmarking: One-third of European dealers fear new market risk rules will have major effect on hedges
Burning ambition: will Europe join the US in setting fire to the rules?
As the US dismantles post-crisis regulations, some think Europe will follow in a bid to boost economic growth
Can US perpetual futures solve their identity crisis?
Market could fall under four different regulatory categories, with sharply diverging outcomes
Banks want AML data upgrade to complement US regulatory reform
FinCEN’s proposed overhaul sparks debate on whether it will lead to smarter or weaker supervision