US SEC to begin work on Basel II rules
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will soon issue a set of proposals, consisting of rule amendments and new rules, to create two separate voluntary regulatory frameworks for the supervision of broker-dealers and their affiliates on a consolidated basis, according to an announcement on Wednesday.
The other proposal would provide a Basel II framework for the consolidated supervision of holding companies of broker-dealers, also known as ‘investment bank holding companies’. These entities would have to apply to be supervised by the SEC, and would be subject to supervision by the SEC of the firms’ record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The SEC has come in for heavy criticism during the past few months from regulators and banks around the world. Until the advent of these new rule proposals, it seemed possible that US investment banks would not be subject to the new Basel II proposals for banking supervision. The SEC had not been part of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and had not supervised the banks that it oversaw on a consolidated basis. As a result, firms such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley would have been forced to comply with Basel II in Europe, but not at their US headquarters.
European banks, which believed this would place them at a competitive disadvantage, were vocal in their criticism of US regulatory authorities. They were joined by European regulators, which argued that US authorities needed to apply Basel II to the large investment banks as well behind closed doors.
The comment period for this document will start as soon as it is published in full in the Federal Register. It will last for 90 days.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos