NAB to lose up to A$180 million on unauthorised FX options trades
National Australia Bank (NAB) is set to lose up to A$180 million ($140 million) from unauthorised foreign exchange option trades, despite efforts to improve its operational risk management in the past couple of years.
The losses resulted from trades on the Australian dollar and New Zealand dollar options markets. It wasn’t clear whether the options involved Australian dollar/New Zealand dollar cross-currency pairs or the cross-currency rates between the two currencies and other currencies.
The dealers sought to cover the initial losses with unauthorised trades on NAB’s account, said one source familiar with the NAB investigation. "It appears that there was a large number of small trades," the source said.
"NAB internal controls caught the unauthorised trading quickly but didn’t prevent it," said a Singapore-based analyst. He added that the underlying issue was related to operational risk within a large organisation that has grown rapidly through mergers and acquisitions in recent years.
Four members of the bank’s currency options trading team were involved in unauthorised options trades from October to mid-January, said NAB spokesman Robert Hadler. NAB’s board subsequently suspended the four employees and closed all outstanding trades to stop further losses.
Hadler said the next step is to complete an internal review and work with policing authorities to decide on further action.
NAB has also reviewed its risk management procedures, although no changes are planned. One on-going change that may help is NAB’s current introduction of an electronic forex options system to replace the existing manual system, Hadler said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting