Isda AGM: Buffett’s criticisms of the derivatives market rebuffed
A wide range of leading derivatives practitioners attending the International Swaps and Derivatives (Isda) annual general meeting spoke out against last month’s comments by US investor Warren Buffett, in which he compared derivatives to “weapons of mass destruction”.
“We need to continue to fight energetically to get across to the world at large and the financial markets at large what derivatives are about and what the benefits can be,” said Jonathan Chenevix-Trench, managing director and head of European fixed income, and global head of interest rates and foreign exchange at Morgan Stanley. “I think the combination of tremendous success in terms of growth and a lack of understanding outside of the industry continues to be a danger.”
In a letter to shareholders of his investment company Berkshire Hathaway last month, Buffett wrote that derivatives are “time bombs”, whose “potentially lethal” dangers could threaten the stability of the financial system.
Several derivatives executives have since pointed out that these comments reflect Buffett’s difficulties in closing down Gen Re Financial Products, the derivatives unit of insurance company Gen Re that Buffett acquired in 1999. Having attempted unsuccessfully to sell the derivatives arm to a variety of potential buyers, Buffett has been forced to slowly wind down the business.
“I think a lot of the criticism was coming from the frustration [Buffett] was experiencing in shutting down Gen Re Financial Products,” said Kaushik Amin, managing director and co-head of global interest rate products at Lehman Brothers. “Gen Re was an entity focused on an esoteric area, with very long maturity contracts focused on particular sub-sectors of the derivatives market and it is no surprise that it is very difficult for Buffet to shut it down, especially as he was unwilling to pay a realistic price that you need to pay to exit the market.”
Nonetheless, bankers warned that a continued lack of understanding of derivatives within some sectors of the financial industry, combined with high volatility in the markets, could lead to calls for over-regulation, potentially restricting the growth of the derivatives market.
“It is important in these emotional and turbulent times that regulators and bodies that set standards resist the temptation to over-react and unilaterally set standards that ultimately prejudice the use of derivatives,” said Jerry del Missier, managing director and global head of rates and private equity at Barclays Capital. “And I think it is a responsibility of the derivatives industry and Isda in these difficult times to continue to engage bodies, to push back when we think that they are proposing irrational measures and ensure that we get a sensible oversight.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”