Isda AGM: Buffett’s criticisms of the derivatives market rebuffed
A wide range of leading derivatives practitioners attending the International Swaps and Derivatives (Isda) annual general meeting spoke out against last month’s comments by US investor Warren Buffett, in which he compared derivatives to “weapons of mass destruction”.
“We need to continue to fight energetically to get across to the world at large and the financial markets at large what derivatives are about and what the benefits can be,” said Jonathan Chenevix-Trench, managing director and head of European fixed income, and global head of interest rates and foreign exchange at Morgan Stanley. “I think the combination of tremendous success in terms of growth and a lack of understanding outside of the industry continues to be a danger.”
In a letter to shareholders of his investment company Berkshire Hathaway last month, Buffett wrote that derivatives are “time bombs”, whose “potentially lethal” dangers could threaten the stability of the financial system.
Several derivatives executives have since pointed out that these comments reflect Buffett’s difficulties in closing down Gen Re Financial Products, the derivatives unit of insurance company Gen Re that Buffett acquired in 1999. Having attempted unsuccessfully to sell the derivatives arm to a variety of potential buyers, Buffett has been forced to slowly wind down the business.
“I think a lot of the criticism was coming from the frustration [Buffett] was experiencing in shutting down Gen Re Financial Products,” said Kaushik Amin, managing director and co-head of global interest rate products at Lehman Brothers. “Gen Re was an entity focused on an esoteric area, with very long maturity contracts focused on particular sub-sectors of the derivatives market and it is no surprise that it is very difficult for Buffet to shut it down, especially as he was unwilling to pay a realistic price that you need to pay to exit the market.”
Nonetheless, bankers warned that a continued lack of understanding of derivatives within some sectors of the financial industry, combined with high volatility in the markets, could lead to calls for over-regulation, potentially restricting the growth of the derivatives market.
“It is important in these emotional and turbulent times that regulators and bodies that set standards resist the temptation to over-react and unilaterally set standards that ultimately prejudice the use of derivatives,” said Jerry del Missier, managing director and global head of rates and private equity at Barclays Capital. “And I think it is a responsibility of the derivatives industry and Isda in these difficult times to continue to engage bodies, to push back when we think that they are proposing irrational measures and ensure that we get a sensible oversight.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Already under FRTB, some banks hope for modelling reprieve
Risk Live: BMO and UBS opted for SA, but believe regulators could still opt to follow softer US rules
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins