Big US banks forced to adopt Basel II, says expert
Boston -- Internationally active American banks will have to implement the new Basel Accord, also known as Basel II, even if it is not adopted in the United States, says Kevin Fisher, president of Boston-based management consultancy Dartmouth Research.
Speaking in an interview after the workshop, Operational Risk in the Securities and Investment Industry, organised by the Securities Operations Forum in New York at the end of January, Fisher says US banks would be forced to implement Basel II by regulators in the countries in which they operate.
“The bottom line is that all the foreign banks with operations in the US have to comply with such rules as the Sarbanes-Oxley and others; it is only fair and operationally efficient for US banks to comply with Basel II when they operate in a Basel II country.
“Whether Basel II is adopted here or not, the banks that have operations in Europe, for example, or in any other region where Basel II will be in effect, will have to adopt the accord for them to operate there.
“Basel II is a real international forum which brings about change in how we manage our risks. This is necessary because the markets and risks have changed themselves. We have to expect regulations to move with these changes in the market. If the banks follow the spirit of the regulations, they will not find Basel II burdensome,” says Fisher.
He says although the regulatory landscape in the US banking industry had been complicated by the presence of four regulators, each with different expectations and interpretations of Basel II, there was a general agreement that there is a lot of good in the new international capital accord.
“The challenge to the US government is to rationalise and streamline the level of regulation among the different regulators, who all have different rules,” he says.
The chairman of the US Senate Banking Committee, Richard Selby, was quoted in the UK press in January as having expressed serious reservations about whether the US could ever adopt Basel II, speaking at a World Economic Forum fringe event in Davos, Switzerland. Selby says bank regulators in the US had expressed scepticism about adopting Basel II in its current format.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision, along with MarketAxess
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules