Agencies postpone implementation of Central Data Repository
The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) Call Report Agencies (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Federal Reserve Board and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) have postponed the implementation of the new Central Data Repository (CDR) to 2005, according to the FFIEC.
The CDR, a comprehensive database for storing and managing consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report) data from more than 8,000 reporting entities, including banks and insurance companies, was to be implemented on September 30, 2004.
Every national bank, state member bank and insured non-member bank is required by the FFIEC to file call reports as of the close of business on the last day of each calendar quarter. The three agencies will have access to the repository.
The users and providers of financial institution data will use the CDR as a centralised resource, which will facilitate a more efficient regulatory reporting process by enhancing the methods used to collect, validate, process and distribute call report data.
Among the goals of the modernisation initiative are faster validation and release of call report data; improved agility in accommodating changing business environments and emerging risks; greater data reuse; and improved co-ordination of resources among the agencies.
Once the CDR has been implemented, financial institutions will transmit their data to the repository through the internet, using software approved by the federal agencies.
BaselAlert.com
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities