Fisco publishes study on barriers to cross-border securities trading
The European Commission’s Clearing and Settlement Fiscal Compliance expert group (Fisco) has issued a fact-finding study examining EU fiscal compliance procedures for clearing and settlement of cross-border securities transactions. The study analyses how these procedures hinder the functioning of capital markets and increase the cost of cross-border settlements, particularly in relation to withholding and transaction taxes. The Fisco group will issue a further report proposing solutions by early 2007.
Main conclusions of the study include focus on withholding tax procedures and transaction tax procedures.
Withholding tax procedures:
• Withholding tax collection and relief procedures vary considerably among Member States. Different procedures often apply even to different classes of securities within the same Member State.
• The complexity and administrative costs resulting from these differences may lead investors to forgo the relief to which they are entitled and may discourage cross-border investment for the same reason.
• In several cases, procedural tax rules often prevent foreign intermediaries from obtaining direct access to the local Central Securities Depository (CSD), or at least do not allow them to obtain access under conditions similar to those applicable to local intermediaries.
Transaction tax procedures:
• Tax rules that impose tax collection responsibilities on settlement service providers do not always take into account the fact that securities transactions may be handled by several local or foreign settlement service providers. These rules do not allow all settlement service providers to collect transfer taxes under similar conditions.
• This issue may put certain settlement service providers at a competitive disadvantage in comparison with others.
Click here to see the study.BaselAlert.com
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London