
IIF board express concerns over different time schedules for implementation
Other issues range from the decisions on the regulatory capital levels that the Basel Committee will finally determine and home-host and cross-border jurisdictional issues. The IIF stressed that these issues need to be addressed as soon as possible to ensure proper implementation. Referring to a recent meeting with regulators, Cees Maas, vice-chairman and treasurer of the IIF board, said: “Our concerns are well understood by the regulators. It was well recognised that the uncertainty over implementation timing threatens the overall momentum in resolving numerous outstanding technical issues relating to the Accord.”
The IIF, the accounting task force of the Basel committee and the international accounting standards board, recently met to discuss developing approaches that would allow for provisioning methodology acceptable to banks, auditors and regulators, simplifying current hedge accounting rules and the increasing likelihood that the US will accept International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) without the need for costly reconciliations that are currently imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Further meetings are scheduled for later this year.
In his closing comments, Maas stated that the IIF’s work is just starting: “We need to strive to work together with the regulators to see that regulations are developed in such a way that they are able to keep pace with rapid changes in the market-place, recognise the global character of the financial services business and achieve accepted regulatory goals both effectively and efficiently.”
BaselAlert.comOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC cyber rules risk creating web of confusion and costs
Proposals would require breach notifications, public disclosures and annual cyber assessments
Indonesia readies close-out netting after passing P2SK Law
Bankruptcy law changes remove close-out netting obstacles
Behnam comments fan JSCC hopes for US client clearing
Japan clearing exec welcomes CFTC chair’s pledge to keep discussing OTC clearing status for non-US houses
Top 10 operational risks: The umpire strikes back
Tougher regulatory enforcement, new consumer rules and rise of ESG are ringing alarm bells
SVB wouldn’t happen in Europe, says Deutsche CIB head
Campelli also thinks Credit Suisse’s bailed-in AT1 bonds acted as originally intended
How Finma milked Credit Suisse’s CoCos to close UBS deal
An unusual clause in Swiss AT1 bonds allowed them to be written off, but could others follow suit?
Fed’s climate stress test whips up storm for banks
Long-awaited US climate risk exercise puts tough pressure on banks’ data and models