CEBS releases report on current supervisory practices on large exposures
The Committee of European Banking Supersivion (CEBS) has carried out a survey of member states’ implementation of the large exposures rules. The report provides a review of the different regulatory approaches and insights into the proposed manner of implementation of the new and old options in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD). The report also indicates where there are synergies and conflicts of practice between national supervisory authorities.
The report represents the first step in a review of the large exposures framework. “Consideration of the commonalities and divergences identified will form an important aspect of the next stage of the work. A further key step, which is currently in progress, is a thorough consideration of industry practices in relation to the measurement and management of large exposure and concentration risk,” CEBS stated on its website.
Due to Basel II requirements, CEBS found that the large exposures rules will need to be reviewed to take into consideration new market practices in the risk management of large exposures and the interrelationship between the measurement of these exposures in Pillar I and the Pillar II rules on concentration of risk.
CEBS is conducting a public consultation on Pillar II guidance with regard to concentration risk, which is also being addressed by the Basel Committee.
Click here to see the report in full.
BaselAlert.comOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack