CEBS releases report on current supervisory practices on large exposures
The Committee of European Banking Supersivion (CEBS) has carried out a survey of member states’ implementation of the large exposures rules. The report provides a review of the different regulatory approaches and insights into the proposed manner of implementation of the new and old options in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD). The report also indicates where there are synergies and conflicts of practice between national supervisory authorities.
The report represents the first step in a review of the large exposures framework. “Consideration of the commonalities and divergences identified will form an important aspect of the next stage of the work. A further key step, which is currently in progress, is a thorough consideration of industry practices in relation to the measurement and management of large exposure and concentration risk,” CEBS stated on its website.
Due to Basel II requirements, CEBS found that the large exposures rules will need to be reviewed to take into consideration new market practices in the risk management of large exposures and the interrelationship between the measurement of these exposures in Pillar I and the Pillar II rules on concentration of risk.
CEBS is conducting a public consultation on Pillar II guidance with regard to concentration risk, which is also being addressed by the Basel Committee.
Click here to see the report in full.
BaselAlert.comOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
