SEC heads for IFRS acceptance by 2014
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) aims to bring international financial reporting standards (IFRS) into use in the US within the next six years.
The SEC announced yesterday that its roadmap, to be published shortly for public comment, would lead to the standards being available to US issuers by 2014, potentially replacing the US generally accepted accounting standards (Gaap).
The commission will take a firm decision on whether to make the move in 2011, but the news was welcomed by the financial industry. Barry Melancon, president of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, said: "We believe the capital markets ultimately will insist on IFRS for public companies. Today's action by the SEC continues a robust and thoughtful debate that is critical as the transition occurs." A faster transition would be difficult, as 31% of the institute's members believed they would need four to five years to prepare for the move, the institute added.
And James Turley, chief executive of Ernst & Young, commented: "The dominant language of financial reporting worldwide is fast becoming IFRS. Notwithstanding the strength and size of the US capital market, we cannot afford to be left behind."
But the consequences of the convergence for firms' balance sheets could be massive. The recent decision by the US Financial Accounting Standards Board to force banks to account for - potentially - trillions of dollars worth of off-balance sheet assets raised fears of a massive shock to an already beleaguered industry. However, this move can be seen as part of the process of convergence on IFRS standards, industry observers say.
See also: Risk Books: SEC Regulation Outside the United States
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Imminent US shake-up of LCR slated to include discount window
Adding Fed liquidity facility to bank regulation may help overcome stigma, raise lending capacity
French regulator wants permanent changes to EU’s output floor
Push for capital relief faces resistance from supervisors in Finland and the Netherlands
Council plans take Aquis, BME out of Esma oversight
German push to exempt Deutsche Börse catches three others, according to sources
Why watering down resolution plans is a bad idea
Bank failures are inevitable; banking crises are not
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
‘European SEC’ no silver bullet for growth
EU policymakers hope a single, centralised supervisor will help rev up Europe’s economy but critics are mustering
Permanent FRTB reforms seen as vital for IMA adoption
Temporary relief granted in June has done little to encourage internal model use in Europe
How to ensure the next Credit Suisse or SVB fails ‘well’
Regulators are planning changes to resolution rules after criticism that living wills were ignored in previous bank collapses