SEC heads for IFRS acceptance by 2014
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) aims to bring international financial reporting standards (IFRS) into use in the US within the next six years.
The SEC announced yesterday that its roadmap, to be published shortly for public comment, would lead to the standards being available to US issuers by 2014, potentially replacing the US generally accepted accounting standards (Gaap).
The commission will take a firm decision on whether to make the move in 2011, but the news was welcomed by the financial industry. Barry Melancon, president of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, said: "We believe the capital markets ultimately will insist on IFRS for public companies. Today's action by the SEC continues a robust and thoughtful debate that is critical as the transition occurs." A faster transition would be difficult, as 31% of the institute's members believed they would need four to five years to prepare for the move, the institute added.
And James Turley, chief executive of Ernst & Young, commented: "The dominant language of financial reporting worldwide is fast becoming IFRS. Notwithstanding the strength and size of the US capital market, we cannot afford to be left behind."
But the consequences of the convergence for firms' balance sheets could be massive. The recent decision by the US Financial Accounting Standards Board to force banks to account for - potentially - trillions of dollars worth of off-balance sheet assets raised fears of a massive shock to an already beleaguered industry. However, this move can be seen as part of the process of convergence on IFRS standards, industry observers say.
See also: Risk Books: SEC Regulation Outside the United States
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say