US merger brings uncertain future for BoA/ Fleet FX staff
Bank of America’s (BoA) $47 billion purchase of FleetBoston Financial should bolster its regional US coverage in foreign exchange. But an overlap in jobs is unavoidable with a bank the size of BoA, analysts told RiskNews ' sister publication FX Week , and the outlook is uncertain for staff at both firms.
Bank of America’s forex coverage is also likely to extend to Boston-based mutual funds, said David Gilmore, partner at FX Analytics in Connecticut. It is expected that BoA will not have the risk appetite to take on FleetBoston’s considerable exposure to Latin American markets. Although BoA does still maintain a significant presence in Mexico, it has scaled back its foreign exchange activity in Brazil and Argentina, following last year’s poor performance and volatility.
Outside the US and South America, BoA’s forex group dwarfs FleetBoston’s. In London, it has 60 trading, sales and research staff compared with Fleet’s six. In Asia too, BoA has a greater presence, although Fleet would not give details of its activities in the region.
As yet, no decisions have been made about management in foreign exchange, although BoA’s Ed Brown will continue in his current position as president of global corporate and investment banking following the completion of the deal, the bank said. Staff at both banks were cautiously optimistic regarding the merger. One sales analyst said, "We are very positive but there is mixed confidence over our jobs."
The stock-for-stock transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2004, subject to regulatory approval.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos