Linkage between op risk measurement and management key, says Lawrence
Operational risk managers must face up to how they directly link op risk measurement to the process of op risk management, said Mark Lawrence, chief risk officer at ANZ Bank in Australia, today at the annual Operational Risk conference in London.
Lawrence said these factors demonstrated the difficulty of measuring operational risk. “It really is different from credit and market risk because there is this dependence on the quality of internal controls: are they there, are they robust, do they work? If they break down, how bad could the consequences be?" he queried.
Lawrence said ANZ had used the report to conduct an internal review by distilling down a dozen or so control failures, and assessing whether or not the bank also had the potential to experience those kinds of failures. "We took the results of that review to our board," he said. But, concluded Lawrence, the ultimate success or failure of the various methods proposed for measuring operational risk capital today will be determined by the strength of their connection to the operational risk management process. "This is the holy grail, the pot at the end of the rainbow,” Lawrence said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising