Linkage between op risk measurement and management key, says Lawrence
Operational risk managers must face up to how they directly link op risk measurement to the process of op risk management, said Mark Lawrence, chief risk officer at ANZ Bank in Australia, today at the annual Operational Risk conference in London.
Lawrence said these factors demonstrated the difficulty of measuring operational risk. “It really is different from credit and market risk because there is this dependence on the quality of internal controls: are they there, are they robust, do they work? If they break down, how bad could the consequences be?" he queried.
Lawrence said ANZ had used the report to conduct an internal review by distilling down a dozen or so control failures, and assessing whether or not the bank also had the potential to experience those kinds of failures. "We took the results of that review to our board," he said. But, concluded Lawrence, the ultimate success or failure of the various methods proposed for measuring operational risk capital today will be determined by the strength of their connection to the operational risk management process. "This is the holy grail, the pot at the end of the rainbow,” Lawrence said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry urges EU exchanges to solve equity post-trade frictions
Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan join calls for mandatory cash CCP interoperability
Regulatory clarity urged for CME’s single-stock futures
SEC short selling and market access rules may hamper clearing and broker participation
Imminent US shake-up of LCR slated to include discount window
Adding Fed liquidity facility to bank regulation may help overcome stigma, raise lending capacity
French regulator wants permanent changes to EU’s output floor
Push for capital relief faces resistance from supervisors in Finland and the Netherlands
Council plans take Aquis, BME out of Esma oversight
German push to exempt Deutsche Börse catches three others, according to sources
Why watering down resolution plans is a bad idea
Bank failures are inevitable; banking crises are not
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
‘European SEC’ no silver bullet for growth
EU policymakers hope a single, centralised supervisor will help rev up Europe’s economy but critics are mustering