UK financial firms face £1 billlion start-up bill for Mifid
UK-based financial services firms could face a £1 billion bill for implementing the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid), the UK’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) estimates.
The one-off cost of implementing Mifid is estimated to be between £870 million and £1 billion, with ongoing additional costs of about £100 million a year.
The heaviest financial burden will be the one-off costs arising from the introduction of the appropriateness test for non-advised sales, changes to client categorisation and best-execution requirements, and system changes required by new market transparency provisions (See: Mifid test is threat to banks).
However, Mifid could generate about £200 million per year in quantifiable ongoing benefits, which the FSA attributes to reductions in compliance and transaction costs.
Hector Sants, managing director of wholesale and institutional markets at the FSA, encouraged financial firms to focus on the opportunities offered by the directive – which comes into force next November – as well as the burden of additional costs.
Sants said: “It is in the nature of regulation that costs are relatively easy to define and quantify for firms, while benefits can be harder to pin down. As we have already foreshadowed, it is clear that implementation of Mifid represents a substantial cost to [the] industry particularly in the [next few] years, but it does create the potential for revenue opportunities over the longer term.”
The FSA’s cost estimates are based on a survey of firms in which they were asked to set out their actual and/or expected budget for Mifid implementation. The results from this survey were then aggregated using estimates of the total number of firms directly affected by Mifid. The benefits were calculated against a series of scenarios relating to the impact of Mifid on business practices in the UK’s financial services industry, and the extent to which Mifid contributes to the aim of creating a single EU market for financial services.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product
Europe’s banks can’t agree on how to fix the output floor
Some want market risk excluded, while others push for greater savings from credit modelling
SEC gunning to take over Cat in 2027
Regulator's bid for control of market surveillance apparatus splits industry participants