Basel Committee releases new op risk sound practices paper
The risk management group of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision today released a final paper outlining a framework for the effective management and supervision of operational risk.
The paper generally advocates strong oversight by the bank’s board of directors and senior management, a strong operational risk culture throughout the organisation, effective internal reporting and contingency planning. After the publication of the July 2002 paper, many national groups, including the UK Financial Services Authority’s operational risk implementation advisory group (ORIAG), provided input for the Basel Committee’s revisions.
The February paper seems to be a fine-tuning of the July 2002 draft, more than a radical overhaul. Changes, for the most part, come down to the addition of a word or the reorganising of a sentence. One member of the Basel Committee that redrafted the document described it as “a matter of refinement”.
“The real question is how will this paper fit in with this issue of international convergence of supervisory policing of the operational framework,” said Richard Metcalfe, a director at the International Swaps and Derivatives Association in London and a member of the ORIAG group. “Can we build on that to have some true international co-ordination? It is a vital point.”
The Committee member added: “The hope is that this is something that can be used and adopted by banking supervisors in all jurisdictions. Whether we will achieve this or not, one never knows. But we feel that we have a good document here.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance