CPDOs under review as Moody’s announces further error
New York-based ratings agency Moody’s Investor Services announced on September 4 it might downgrade several constant proportion debt obligations (CPDOs) after discovering another error in its securities monitoring.
Moody’s has placed €854 million worth of European CPDOs under review following the discovery of a coding error in the model used to monitor the securities since late June. Moody’s says the error does not stem from a fault in rating rationale or methodology. The review is expected to be completed by September 15, and is likely to prompt a one- or two-notch downgrade for the CPDOs affected, which are rated between A3 and B1 at present.
Moody's said this latest error is unrelated to the mis-ratings scandal that engulfed the company in July, when it was revealed it had acted to avoid making the CPDO downgrades implied by a change in its analysis model in early 2007.
But three of the static deals facing downgrade have already been affected by the previous model error.
Moody’s head of structured finance, Noel Kirnon, left the firm in July following the announcement of disciplinary proceedings over mis-rating of European CPDOs.
See also: Moody's shakes up structured finance team as CPDO scandal grows
Senior Moody's exec to leave after CPDO ratings cover-up revealed
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards