US rule proposal could boost insurer derivatives use
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), an official body that develops model insurance regulations for adoption at the US state level, is considering a new accounting guideline that would allow US-based insurers to report hedge transactions in their underwriting income statements. All US insurers must comply with statutory accounting guidelines, so this potential change could encourage greater use of derivatives.
Remaining details will be discussed in a conference call next month.
Current US statutory guidelines require hedges to be reported in investment or other income, which has held up wider use of insurance risk hedging, according to Alton. “The accounting guideline we’re proposing for statutory is exactly what’s in FAS 133,” he said, referring to the new accounting standard requiring US corporations to mark their hedges to market. “If we can show we’ve transferred risk through a derivatives contract and the derivative's highly effective, then the benchmark is exactly the same for Gaap.”
Once entered on its underwriting income statement, a qualifying hedge under the new guideline could improve an insurer’s combined ratio and loss ratio, which measure insurer financial performance and credit quality.
Alton said the new guideline, if approved by the NAIC, and adopted by any US states, would not be a “night and day” change, but rather another tool for insurers to manage their risks in addition to traditional reinsurance.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption