US rule proposal could boost insurer derivatives use
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), an official body that develops model insurance regulations for adoption at the US state level, is considering a new accounting guideline that would allow US-based insurers to report hedge transactions in their underwriting income statements. All US insurers must comply with statutory accounting guidelines, so this potential change could encourage greater use of derivatives.
Remaining details will be discussed in a conference call next month.
Current US statutory guidelines require hedges to be reported in investment or other income, which has held up wider use of insurance risk hedging, according to Alton. “The accounting guideline we’re proposing for statutory is exactly what’s in FAS 133,” he said, referring to the new accounting standard requiring US corporations to mark their hedges to market. “If we can show we’ve transferred risk through a derivatives contract and the derivative's highly effective, then the benchmark is exactly the same for Gaap.”
Once entered on its underwriting income statement, a qualifying hedge under the new guideline could improve an insurer’s combined ratio and loss ratio, which measure insurer financial performance and credit quality.
Alton said the new guideline, if approved by the NAIC, and adopted by any US states, would not be a “night and day” change, but rather another tool for insurers to manage their risks in addition to traditional reinsurance.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage
UK securitisation reforms trump EU’s, say market players
Originators and investors could find UK securitised assets easier to deal with after tandem reviews