EC works to cut reliance on rating agencies
The European Commission hopes to reduce the dependence of financial institutions, regulators and governments on rating agencies, which it sees as a key factor in the current financial crisis.
The European Parliament plans to debate new restrictions on rating agencies in October this year. According to the Commission's consultation documents, this could include reducing regulatory reliance on credit ratings, encouraging large institutions to use their own internal assessments rather than external ratings, and compelling agencies to include 'health warnings' about the risks involved with rated assets.
The EC also proposes tighter regulation of credit rating agencies (CRAs). The agencies, it said in one of the documents, "were close to the origin of the problems that have arisen in the professional structured credit markets, notably with respect to the rating of structured instruments in which subprime mortgages were embedded".
The document continued: "Many investors in these highly sophisticated instruments relied predominantly on the CRAs' expertise and judgements and took little interest in the risk characteristics of these instruments, the performance of the underlying assets or the general market outlook."
More EC involvement, it said, will probably follow "the manifest failure of self-regulatory efforts, both formal and informal, to ensure high standards of independence, integrity and professional diligence".
Regulation could be carried out by existing national regulators, combined with assistance from the EU-wide Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), or by a newly created EU agency, the EC suggested.
In recent weeks, the ratings agencies have come under concerted criticism from regulators and industry lobby groups around the world for their role in the current credit crisis.
See also: Ratings agencies must try harder, Sifma says
Iosco says regulators should monitor and inspect rating agencies
SEC hits out at agencies over RMBS
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision