
EC works to cut reliance on rating agencies
The European Parliament plans to debate new restrictions on rating agencies in October this year. According to the Commission's consultation documents, this could include reducing regulatory reliance on credit ratings, encouraging large institutions to use their own internal assessments rather than external ratings, and compelling agencies to include 'health warnings' about the risks involved with rated assets.
The EC also proposes tighter regulation of credit rating agencies (CRAs). The agencies, it said in one of the documents, "were close to the origin of the problems that have arisen in the professional structured credit markets, notably with respect to the rating of structured instruments in which subprime mortgages were embedded".
The document continued: "Many investors in these highly sophisticated instruments relied predominantly on the CRAs' expertise and judgements and took little interest in the risk characteristics of these instruments, the performance of the underlying assets or the general market outlook."
More EC involvement, it said, will probably follow "the manifest failure of self-regulatory efforts, both formal and informal, to ensure high standards of independence, integrity and professional diligence".
Regulation could be carried out by existing national regulators, combined with assistance from the EU-wide Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), or by a newly created EU agency, the EC suggested.
In recent weeks, the ratings agencies have come under concerted criticism from regulators and industry lobby groups around the world for their role in the current credit crisis.
See also: Ratings agencies must try harder, Sifma says
Iosco says regulators should monitor and inspect rating agencies
SEC hits out at agencies over RMBS
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates
Bankers call for overhaul of EBA stress tests
Support for multiple scenarios, but only if fixed assumptions and variables are scaled back
CFTC plan to relax MMF margin restriction sparks debate
Industry welcomes proposal to lift ban on repo-using funds as eligible IM, but some warn MMFs bring risks
Legal challenges loom for renewed US focus on Sifis
Lawyers say any FSOC attempt to designate systemic non-banks risks a repeat of MetLife case