Rogue trade loses MF Global $141.5 million
Interdealer broker MF Global loses $141.5 million
NEW YORK - Interdealer broker MF Global has lost $141.5 million after it was forced to cover trading losses made by one of its employees.
The broker announced today that an error in its order entry system had allowed the US-based trader to put on massive directional trades in wheat futures on his own account yesterday morning. The trades were noticed and liquidated later that morning, but, as MF Global is responsible, it will have to cover the $141.5 million losses he incurred.
The trader, whose name is not known, has now been fired, MF Global said. It added that client funds had not been affected by the trades. The broker had taken a position of several thousand futures contracts on the Chicago Board of Trade, MF chief executive Kevin Davis said in a conference call today.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said that it "continues to be in close contact" with MF Global and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the designated regulator for the broker. "MF Global is currently in compliance with the agency's regulatory capital requirements," the CFTC added.
Wheat prices have been extremely volatile - winter wheat on the CME varied between $10.65 and $13.34 a bushel yesterday, an almost unprecedentedly wide range.
MF Global was formerly Man Financial before being spun off by the parent company in July 2007.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure