
Final US goodwill rule issued
Daily news headlines
These accounting changes aim to ease banks' capital accounting in light of the financial crisis. Quietly released and scarcely noticed by the media, an interagency notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) was published on September 15 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) and the Federal Reserve that provided for the more favourable accounting treatment of so-called goodwill, an intangible asset that reflects the difference between a bank's market value and its selling price.
Under the rule, the regulatory capital deduction for goodwill would be equal to the maximum capital reduction that could occur as a result of a complete write-off of the goodwill, which is equal to the amount of goodwill reported on the balance sheet under US generally accepted accounting principles, less any associated deferred tax liability. Essentially, the regulators are permitting buyers of banks and thrifts to count some of the goodwill towards meeting their regulatory capital requirements.
The current market turmoil has caused banks to drastically reign in their lending; this new rule is an attempt to reduce the erosion of their capital cushion. Although the move will be welcomed by many, some industry sources have described it as a desperate and dangerous solution.
The goodwill sale was last used during the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s and 1990s, when the Federal Home Loan Board (now the OTS) permitted thrifts to count goodwill towards regulatory capital, which helped many institutions in the short run. However, once it was taken away, the overall cost of the bail-out skyrocketed, as it had masked insolvency and allowed thrifts to become even more leveraged relative to assets. Some say there is a danger the current situation will follow the same path.
The final rule will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. However, banking organisations may adopt its provisions for purposes of regulatory capital reporting for the period ending December 31, 2008.
Click here for the draft Federal Register notice.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SVB opens floodgates on liquidity buffers debate
European regulator says HQLAs should be booked at fair value, but not everyone agrees
SEC cyber rules risk creating web of confusion and costs
Proposals would require breach notifications, public disclosures and annual cyber assessments
Indonesia readies close-out netting after passing P2SK Law
Bankruptcy law changes remove close-out netting obstacles
Top 10 operational risks: The umpire strikes back
Tougher regulatory enforcement, new consumer rules and rise of ESG are ringing alarm bells
Behnam comments fan JSCC hopes for US client clearing
Japan clearing exec welcomes CFTC chair’s pledge to keep discussing OTC clearing status for non-US houses
SVB wouldn’t happen in Europe, says Deutsche CIB head
Campelli also thinks Credit Suisse’s bailed-in AT1 bonds acted as originally intended
How Finma milked Credit Suisse’s CoCos to close UBS deal
An unusual clause in Swiss AT1 bonds allowed them to be written off, but could others follow suit?