Final US goodwill rule issued
Final rule issued to permit the deduction of goodwill from Tier I capital
These accounting changes aim to ease banks' capital accounting in light of the financial crisis. Quietly released and scarcely noticed by the media, an interagency notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) was published on September 15 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) and the Federal Reserve that provided for the more favourable accounting treatment of so-called goodwill, an intangible asset that reflects the difference between a bank's market value and its selling price.
Under the rule, the regulatory capital deduction for goodwill would be equal to the maximum capital reduction that could occur as a result of a complete write-off of the goodwill, which is equal to the amount of goodwill reported on the balance sheet under US generally accepted accounting principles, less any associated deferred tax liability. Essentially, the regulators are permitting buyers of banks and thrifts to count some of the goodwill towards meeting their regulatory capital requirements.
The current market turmoil has caused banks to drastically reign in their lending; this new rule is an attempt to reduce the erosion of their capital cushion. Although the move will be welcomed by many, some industry sources have described it as a desperate and dangerous solution.
The goodwill sale was last used during the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s and 1990s, when the Federal Home Loan Board (now the OTS) permitted thrifts to count goodwill towards regulatory capital, which helped many institutions in the short run. However, once it was taken away, the overall cost of the bail-out skyrocketed, as it had masked insolvency and allowed thrifts to become even more leveraged relative to assets. Some say there is a danger the current situation will follow the same path.
The final rule will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. However, banking organisations may adopt its provisions for purposes of regulatory capital reporting for the period ending December 31, 2008.
Click here for the draft Federal Register notice.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie