
FSA fines two UK firms in major TCF crackdown
LOSSES & LAWSUITS
For two years HFC - a subsidiary of HSBC - sold PPI to 163,000 customers but failed to provide suitable advice, or put adequate systems and controls in place. The firm did not require its advisers to gather enough information on customers' financial circumstances, explain fully why they recommended a sale, or identify to customers any demands and needs that the policy would not meet.
Taking out PPI - designed to protect against unemployment or illness - is the most lucrative form of UK insurance. It can add costs of £3,000 to a £7,500 loan. The bank joins 11 other firms fined for mis-selling PPI, including GE Capital Bank, which was fined £610,000, and Capital One Bank, which was fined £175,000.
Meanwhile, stockbroker Square Mile was fined £250,000 for using persistent high-pressure sales tactics and misleading information to sell consumers shares they did not want or could not afford. The firm deals in derivatives and securities sold on the Alternative Investment Market and PLUS markets, which provide primary and secondary trading services for smaller capitalised and emerging companies. Examples of the firm's sales tactics included telephoning one customer 17 times in 10 days, and selling almost £300,000 of high-risk securities to an 89-year-old customer without permission. The penalties to HFC and Square Mile mark a significant increase in enforcement of the principles of the FSA's Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) initiative.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates
Bankers call for overhaul of EBA stress tests
Support for multiple scenarios, but only if fixed assumptions and variables are scaled back
CFTC plan to relax MMF margin restriction sparks debate
Industry welcomes proposal to lift ban on repo-using funds as eligible IM, but some warn MMFs bring risks
Legal challenges loom for renewed US focus on Sifis
Lawyers say any FSOC attempt to designate systemic non-banks risks a repeat of MetLife case