Lagarde: SocGen losses due to poor op risk
French finance minister blames operational risk for the SocGen fraud
PARIS - The fallout from the rogue-trader scandal at Société Générale continues. Takeover rumours about the institution abound, while the firm is working to finalise a plan to raise more than €5.5 billion in additional capital.
In the meantime, French finance minister Christine Lagarde said earlier in the week: "There is a risk that is operational risk, as opposed to market risk, which must be taken more seriously into consideration." Lagarde made the comment to reporters after handing in a report on the Société Générale affair to prime minister François Fillon.
"Certain internal control mechanisms at Société Générale did not work and those that did were not always followed up with the appropriate changes," said Lagarde. The 11-page report, drawn up with the co-operation of the country’s banking commission and its financial markets authority, identifies several points that "might have been decisive" in the run-up to the scandal, according to various press reports.
The report says banks should devote special attention to tackling internal fraud and that senior managers should be "fully involved" in the effort.
Adding fuel to the fire, recent polls in France have shown that more than 50% of the public blame Société Générale’s senior management for the losses, while less than 15% blame the trader at the centre of the controversy, Jérôme Kerviel.
Lastly, one of the firm’s former internal auditors has given press interviews damning the lack of seniority and experience of its auditing and inspection team. A spokeswoman for SocGen said the former employee’s comments were “defamatory” and that “his motives are of a personal nature”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules