Barclays Scrutinised over Terror State Links
NEW YORK & WASHINGTON, DC - The US Department of Justice and the New York District Attorney are investigating UK bank Barclays over suspected breaches of rules over doing business with states accused by the US of sponsoring terror. The bank admitted it has been questioned over dollar payments through its New York branch involving clients from states such as Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Sudan and Syria. The US has prohibited most dollar transactions with clients from these countries as part of its counter-terrorist financing (CTF) efforts.
The ruling marks another tightening up of the rules on European banks operating in the US. In 2005 Dutch bank ABN Amro was fined $80 million for transactions through its New York office that the US government said failed to meet its anti-money laundering (AML) controls.
Barclays warned in its 2007 annual results that the findings of the US investigation "could be substantial". ABN Amro admitted it is still under AML investigation by the Justice Department and negotiating a potentially costly settlement. The reputational risks could be higher than those measures in dollars. UK-based bank HSBC has admitted it maintains a small office in Tehran and that falling foul of US rules would have "serious legal and reputational consequences". Barclays said it was launching its own internal investigation into the US government probe.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management