Barclays Scrutinised over Terror State Links
NEW YORK & WASHINGTON, DC - The US Department of Justice and the New York District Attorney are investigating UK bank Barclays over suspected breaches of rules over doing business with states accused by the US of sponsoring terror. The bank admitted it has been questioned over dollar payments through its New York branch involving clients from states such as Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Sudan and Syria. The US has prohibited most dollar transactions with clients from these countries as part of its counter-terrorist financing (CTF) efforts.
The ruling marks another tightening up of the rules on European banks operating in the US. In 2005 Dutch bank ABN Amro was fined $80 million for transactions through its New York office that the US government said failed to meet its anti-money laundering (AML) controls.
Barclays warned in its 2007 annual results that the findings of the US investigation "could be substantial". ABN Amro admitted it is still under AML investigation by the Justice Department and negotiating a potentially costly settlement. The reputational risks could be higher than those measures in dollars. UK-based bank HSBC has admitted it maintains a small office in Tehran and that falling foul of US rules would have "serious legal and reputational consequences". Barclays said it was launching its own internal investigation into the US government probe.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage
UK securitisation reforms trump EU’s, say market players
Originators and investors could find UK securitised assets easier to deal with after tandem reviews