Citigroup fined by NASD for misleading mutual funds
The National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) has fined Citigroup $1.1 million for failing to prevent its brokers from submitting false information to mutual funds.
The regulator fined Citigroup Global Markets $400,000 for supervisory and record-keeping violations in a ploy by more than 100 of its brokers to improperly obtain waivers of mutual fund sales charges, by falsely claiming that their customers were disabled.
The firm was also ordered to pay $715, 000 in restitution to the affected mutual fund entities.
The misconduct was committed from June 2001 through June 2002. So far, NASD has taken disciplinary action against five Citigroup-registered representatives relating to this misconduct, as investigations into other Citigroup brokers continue.
Citigroup was ordered to review its policies, systems, procedures and training relating to Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (CDSC) waivers in mutual fund transactions.
NASD found that Citigroup's electronic order entry system provided an unsupervised method for its representatives to obtain CDSC waivers for customers.
Citigroup failed to develop any exception reports, or otherwise provide for reasonable steps to ensure registered representatives' compliance with the applicable prospectus terms.
While Citigroup issued a Compliance Memo in 1999 to its managers and directors advising that CDSC waivers could not be granted "except in circumstances specified in the fund prospectus", the firm failed to implement policies or procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with this directive.
For one year, Citigroup must also provide a quarterly certification to NASD that it has reviewed all CDSC disability waivers granted, has verified that they were appropriately granted (or corrected those waivers that were not appropriately granted), and has retained required supporting documentation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns