Bear bankers face charges over hedge fund losses
Two ex-Bear Stearns asset managers are in hot water over failed hedge funds
NEW YORK – Two former Bear Stearns bankers could face criminal charges over the collapse of two hedge funds that cost the failed bank $6 billion (£3 billion) in July 2007.
Ralf Cioffi and Matthew Tannin could be accused of misleading investors before the two funds folded due to US subprime mortgage debts. The two men could be the first high-profile bankers to stand trial in relation to the subprime crisis.
Investigators from the Department of Justice (DoJ) are reportedly interviewing key witnesses and gathering information related to the case. After the evidence is gathered, the US Attorney for New York’s eastern district, Benton Campbell, will assess if securities laws have been broken and whether to charge the men.
Tannin ran the bank’s asset management while Cioffi was responsible for the funds in question – the High Grade Strategy and Enhanced High Grade fund. After injecting $1.6 billion of capital into the funds in June 2007, the bank abandoned hope for their revival.
Both men have reportedly told friends that they had not realised the true state of the investments within the funds, but were instead coping with the general downturn in debt markets. Cioffi moved $2 million of his own money from one of the funds in March 2007.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous