IT firms report widespread data risks
Firms are offloading data risk to IT providers, according to a new survey by data research institute Ponemon and governance software provider Aveksa
WALTHAM, MA & TRAVERSE, MI – IT providers are not being given enough information to mitigate the data risks of their clients, says a new study by data research institute Ponemon commissioned by governance software firm Aveksa.
The study, The 2008 National Survey on Access Governance, questioned 700 US IT practitioners on their information management relationships with their clients – the two largest employers being the financial services industry (21%) and government institutions (18%).
The survey says 78% of respondents thought employees are granted access to data for which they have no need, with inadequate tools in place to inform and update IT providers of employees’ specific and often evolving responsibilities.
“The IT security organisations are judged on how quickly they deliver access. There’s no automated process to engage a business unit to regularly review users’ access to different information resources. They’re using a manual approach – spreadsheets and email – and it is very inefficient,” says Brian Cleary, Aveksa’s vice-president of marketing.
IT practitioners cannot easily automate policy enforcement and require collaboration to understand what information is relevant for user access. It is not the job of a bank’s IT team to understand what information is pertinent for a retail teller’s role, says Cleary.
“They are not regulatory compliance experts. They need audit, risk and compliance to create a better collaborative framework for governing access.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB revamp won’t restore models to past glory, risk managers say
US-inspired reform only expected to lead to small boost in adoption, with limited desks on IMA
Regulators must think bigger to tackle tech risks, says Hong Kong SFC
Leung warns AI adoption and recent cyber scares show new threats require global co-operation
Time to let some air out of the banking system?
Watchdogs worry about lowering standards, but policy-makers eye growth – they face a difficult dilemma
Competitiveness mandate for Esma faces uphill battle
European Parliament offers last chance to force Esma to take more nuanced approach
Europe expects FRTB to bite on XVA hedges
Risk Benchmarking: One-third of European dealers fear new market risk rules will have major effect on hedges
Burning ambition: will Europe join the US in setting fire to the rules?
As the US dismantles post-crisis regulations, some think Europe will follow in a bid to boost economic growth
Can US perpetual futures solve their identity crisis?
Market could fall under four different regulatory categories, with sharply diverging outcomes
Banks want AML data upgrade to complement US regulatory reform
FinCEN’s proposed overhaul sparks debate on whether it will lead to smarter or weaker supervision