HSBC fined £100,000 by FSA over inaccuracy
LONDON – In mid-December, the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) fined HSBC £100,000 for "failing to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy of transaction reports it made to the FSA from December 2002 until August 2005".
The notice triggered an industry-wide examination of the issue, prompted by a 'Dear CEO' letter the FSA issued on the same day.
According to the FSA, in July 2005 it requested certain trading information from HSBC Stockbroker Services (HSS) which, when reviewed, revealed that HSS had reported the client transaction as a 'sale' prior to a positive announcement and a 'purchase' after it.
Following discussions between the FSA and HSBC, it emerged that transaction reports being made through HSS had been inaccurately representing client purchases as client sales and vice versa.
The regulator noted that it relies on firms to provide accurate transaction reports to enable it to monitor the market effectively, and failing to do so could affect the FSA's ability to maintain confidence in the financial markets and reduce financial crime.
HSBC has taken the necessary remedial steps to improve its systems and controls in this area, and has co-operated fully with the FSA's investigation into this matter, the regulator said.
The FSA has previously fined Bear Stearns £40,000 and UBS £100,000 for inaccuracies in transaction reporting.
The 'Dear CEO' letter can be found at: http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/ceo/transaction_reporting.pdf
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive