HSBC fined £100,000 by FSA over inaccuracy
LONDON – In mid-December, the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) fined HSBC £100,000 for "failing to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy of transaction reports it made to the FSA from December 2002 until August 2005".
The notice triggered an industry-wide examination of the issue, prompted by a 'Dear CEO' letter the FSA issued on the same day.
According to the FSA, in July 2005 it requested certain trading information from HSBC Stockbroker Services (HSS) which, when reviewed, revealed that HSS had reported the client transaction as a 'sale' prior to a positive announcement and a 'purchase' after it.
Following discussions between the FSA and HSBC, it emerged that transaction reports being made through HSS had been inaccurately representing client purchases as client sales and vice versa.
The regulator noted that it relies on firms to provide accurate transaction reports to enable it to monitor the market effectively, and failing to do so could affect the FSA's ability to maintain confidence in the financial markets and reduce financial crime.
HSBC has taken the necessary remedial steps to improve its systems and controls in this area, and has co-operated fully with the FSA's investigation into this matter, the regulator said.
The FSA has previously fined Bear Stearns £40,000 and UBS £100,000 for inaccuracies in transaction reporting.
The 'Dear CEO' letter can be found at: http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/ceo/transaction_reporting.pdf
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations