US regulators to focus on consumer protection, says survey
A new impact report from Aite Group finds US regulators are set to focus on consumer protection.
BOSTON – Concentration by US state regulators on consumer protection is set to increase compliance demands for financial services firms, according to a new report by the Aite Group, an independent research and consultancy firm.
The report, entitled ‘Looking Ahead: An Analysis of Pending State Legislation and Financial Institutions’, looks at US state legislature level, where there are more than 176 pending bills focusing on mortgages, 183 looking into banking practices and 233 looking into the problem of identity theft.
There are more than 1,300 bills relating to financial service providers, and they could potentially affect banks, credit unions and other firms offering services such as deposit accounts, lending, credit cards and mortgages.
The report expects between 5% and 20% of the bills to pass, and for consumer protection issues to remain on the agenda.
New York was the standout leader with 284 pending bills. Some 32% of those relate to mortgages, 26% to banking operations and 16% to credit cards.
Analysis of US regulation is easiest at the federal level, where a limited number of bodies with highly developed infrastructures, but the sheer volume and relative independence of legislation at state level makes for a more daunting task.
Eva Weber, Aite Group analyst and author of the report, says: “While concerns over the current economic climate and the possibility that subprime mortgage lending will lead the country into recession have resulted in sabre rattling by the US Congress and federal regulators, several states are already putting laws in place to protect their citizens.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage