Moody's sued over inaccurate subprime-backed bond ratings


According to wire service reports, Linda Huber, chief financial officer of Moody's, is being sued by an investor who said Huber failed to disclose that Moody's assigned "excessively" high ratings to bonds backed by subprime mortgages.

The investor alleges that Moody's investors paid artificially high prices for the rating agency's stock because of Huber's "false and misleading" statements. The investor seeks to represent all investors who bought Moody's stock between October 25, 2006 and July 10 this year, and he asks for unspecified damages.

Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings have been criticised by investors because their ratings on bonds backed by mortgages to people with poor or limited credit did not reflect the highest default rate in 10 years. Some bonds backed by subprime mortgages fell by more than 50 cents on the dollar this year without their credit ratings changing.

On top of this, according to the investor's lawsuit, Moody's "shocked investors" in mid-July when it announced the downgrading of 399 mortgage-backed securities issued in 2006 and the review of an additional 32 for downgrade, affecting bonds worth approximately $5.2 billion.

Further legal fallout for the rating agencies is expected over the next new months.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here