Liberty fined $600,000 for AML breach
NEW YORK – US regulators imposed a $600,000 civil fine on the Manhattan-based Liberty Bank in mid-May. The bank, which focuses on Korean-American customers, was upbraided for violations of federal and state anti-money laundering laws in a statement issued by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the New York State Banking Department. Liberty did not admit wrongdoing.
Liberty itself is being acquired by Los Angles' Wilshire Bancorp – which also serves Korean-American customers – for $15.7 million of cash and stock. Final regulatory approval for the deal was received in April.
The regulators said Liberty Bank had failed to implement an adequate Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering programme, with internal controls and appropriate measures to detect and report money laundering and other suspicious activity in a timely manner. The regulators also found that systemic defects in Liberty Bank's anti-money laundering programme resulted in a failure to comply with information-sharing requests from law enforcement under section 314(a) of the USA Patriot Act.
"Today's action against Liberty Bank of New York is a great example of what can be accomplished when state and federal regulators share information," says Diana Taylor, New York state banking superintendent. "The memorandum of understanding signed by the banking department and FinCEN in April 2005 has greatly improved regulators' and law enforcements' ability to take action against institutions that violate the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering laws."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos