Liberty fined $600,000 for AML breach
NEW YORK – US regulators imposed a $600,000 civil fine on the Manhattan-based Liberty Bank in mid-May. The bank, which focuses on Korean-American customers, was upbraided for violations of federal and state anti-money laundering laws in a statement issued by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the New York State Banking Department. Liberty did not admit wrongdoing.
Liberty itself is being acquired by Los Angles' Wilshire Bancorp – which also serves Korean-American customers – for $15.7 million of cash and stock. Final regulatory approval for the deal was received in April.
The regulators said Liberty Bank had failed to implement an adequate Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering programme, with internal controls and appropriate measures to detect and report money laundering and other suspicious activity in a timely manner. The regulators also found that systemic defects in Liberty Bank's anti-money laundering programme resulted in a failure to comply with information-sharing requests from law enforcement under section 314(a) of the USA Patriot Act.
"Today's action against Liberty Bank of New York is a great example of what can be accomplished when state and federal regulators share information," says Diana Taylor, New York state banking superintendent. "The memorandum of understanding signed by the banking department and FinCEN in April 2005 has greatly improved regulators' and law enforcements' ability to take action against institutions that violate the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering laws."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Shared deposit networks eye ‘$2 trillion’ extra capacity
Following post-SVB boom, loosening restrictions expected to lead to gradual rise
Dispute emerges over ‘ambiguity’ of perp markets
Kalshi execs hit back at report’s findings of regulatory fogginess
EBA brainstorming ways to make capital rules competitive
Watchdog aims to provide advice on future revisions before year-end
FRTB revamp won’t restore models to past glory, risk managers say
US-inspired reform only expected to lead to small boost in adoption, with limited desks on IMA
Regulators must think bigger to tackle tech risks, says Hong Kong SFC
Leung warns AI adoption and recent cyber scares show new threats require global co-operation
Time to let some air out of the banking system?
Watchdogs worry about lowering standards, but policy-makers eye growth – they face a difficult dilemma
Competitiveness mandate for Esma faces uphill battle
European Parliament offers last chance to force Esma to take more nuanced approach
Europe expects FRTB to bite on XVA hedges
Risk Benchmarking: One-third of European dealers fear new market risk rules will have major effect on hedges