Ex-Deutsche executives seek £5m from property deal
LONDON – In mid-March, two former Deutsche Bank executives took their former employer to the High Court in London. They alleged that the investment bank had not given them their share of the profits from a £340 million property deal seven years ago.
Paul Rivlin and Neil Lawson-May are suing the bank for alleged breach of contract. They say the terms of their bonus plan entitled them to a percentage share of the profit the bank made on the transaction. Deutsche says the allegation lacks merit, and that the men were both paid more than £1 million in salary and bonuses in 2000, and were not entitled to further payments.
The transaction involved the establishment of a joint venture with the Italian utility firm Enel. Although the two men claim they introduced the deal to the firm the bank says they did not initiate the transaction.
In a statement, the bank said: "Deutsche Bank recognises and rewards real contribution by its employees to its business. In this case, the claimants did not contribute real value to the transaction, nor did they satisfy the relevant criteria."
The two men have since left the firm. They are hoping to win £5 million in compensation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive