OFAC fines National Australia Bank for 'trading with enemies'
SYDNEY - National Australia Bank (NAB) has been fined by the United States' Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) for violating provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act . The bank's US operation is alleged to have conducted banking transactions totalling A$3 million with persons from Cuba, Burma and Sudan.
Under the terms of the Trading with the Enemy Act, the US government restricts the degree to which branches of foreign banks can do business with companies or individuals in certain countries.
OFAC, which monitors such banking activity from within the US Department of the Treasury, has issued an enforcement statement noting that NAB conducted the alleged transactions between November 2003 and December 2005. Most of the transactions were processed through correspondent accounts held by the group at other US banks, although some were processed through NAB's New York branch.
National Australia Bank, which did not break any Australian laws, has been fined US$100,000 but could have faced a US$1 million fine if it had not disclosed the breach to OFAC.
"Due to the significant remediation taken by the bank, including major upgrades to its worldwide compliance policies, as well as the fact that the violations were voluntarily disclosed, OFAC mitigated the potential penalties for these transactions by nearly 90%," said OFAC.
Anti-money laundering regulators have been concerned about the propensity for correspondent banking to be used to launder money from overseas, which has become even more significant with the rise of the internet.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB revamp won’t restore models to past glory, risk managers say
US-inspired reform only expected to lead to small boost in adoption, with limited desks on IMA
Regulators must think bigger to tackle tech risks, says Hong Kong SFC
Leung warns AI adoption and recent cyber scares show new threats require global co-operation
Time to let some air out of the banking system?
Watchdogs worry about lowering standards, but policy-makers eye growth – they face a difficult dilemma
Competitiveness mandate for Esma faces uphill battle
European Parliament offers last chance to force Esma to take more nuanced approach
Europe expects FRTB to bite on XVA hedges
Risk Benchmarking: One-third of European dealers fear new market risk rules will have major effect on hedges
Burning ambition: will Europe join the US in setting fire to the rules?
As the US dismantles post-crisis regulations, some think Europe will follow in a bid to boost economic growth
Can US perpetual futures solve their identity crisis?
Market could fall under four different regulatory categories, with sharply diverging outcomes
Banks want AML data upgrade to complement US regulatory reform
FinCEN’s proposed overhaul sparks debate on whether it will lead to smarter or weaker supervision