OFAC fines National Australia Bank for 'trading with enemies'
SYDNEY - National Australia Bank (NAB) has been fined by the United States' Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) for violating provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act . The bank's US operation is alleged to have conducted banking transactions totalling A$3 million with persons from Cuba, Burma and Sudan.
Under the terms of the Trading with the Enemy Act, the US government restricts the degree to which branches of foreign banks can do business with companies or individuals in certain countries.
OFAC, which monitors such banking activity from within the US Department of the Treasury, has issued an enforcement statement noting that NAB conducted the alleged transactions between November 2003 and December 2005. Most of the transactions were processed through correspondent accounts held by the group at other US banks, although some were processed through NAB's New York branch.
National Australia Bank, which did not break any Australian laws, has been fined US$100,000 but could have faced a US$1 million fine if it had not disclosed the breach to OFAC.
"Due to the significant remediation taken by the bank, including major upgrades to its worldwide compliance policies, as well as the fact that the violations were voluntarily disclosed, OFAC mitigated the potential penalties for these transactions by nearly 90%," said OFAC.
Anti-money laundering regulators have been concerned about the propensity for correspondent banking to be used to launder money from overseas, which has become even more significant with the rise of the internet.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure