Egg Fined £721,000 over PPI
LONDON - The UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined UK credit card firm Egg £721,000 for serious failings in the sale of credit card payment protection insurance (PPI).
The regulator found failings in around 40% of telephone sales of PPI by Egg between January 2005 and December 2007. Egg sold PPI to customers when receiving customer services calls or to new customers, telling staff to use techniques called 'objection handling' to persuade customers to take the insurance when they said they did not want to take out PPI. The regulator said these techniques over-estimated the positives of PPI and in some cases the insurance was applied to bills even when customers requested no such protection.
The company will be expected to write to customers, asking them to call a helpline with concerns and to compensate where appropriate - paying £1.67 million for every 10% of customers receiving a refund.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Banks want AML data upgrade to complement US regulatory reform
FinCEN’s proposed overhaul sparks debate on whether it will lead to smarter or weaker supervision
Industry pushes EU exchanges to solve equity post-trade frictions
Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan join calls for mandatory cash CCP interoperability
Regulatory clarity urged for CME’s single-stock futures
SEC short selling and market access rules may hamper clearing and broker participation
Imminent US shake-up of LCR slated to include discount window
Adding Fed liquidity facility to bank regulation may help overcome stigma, raise lending capacity
French regulator wants permanent changes to EU’s output floor
Push for capital relief faces resistance from supervisors in Finland and the Netherlands
Council plans take Aquis, BME out of Esma oversight
German push to exempt Deutsche Börse catches three others, according to sources
Why watering down resolution plans is a bad idea
Bank failures are inevitable; banking crises are not
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment