Summertime, and the livin' ain't easy
Every summer, there seems to be a Basel II melodrama, and this year is no exception. Although the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: a revised framework last summer, it was by no means finished.
Indeed, US regulators discovered, after they did their own QIS4, that something is out of kilter, because capital plummeted for many banks. What to do? They refrained from publishing the draft US regulatory rules and picked up the hotline to Brussels.
But things aren't much easier there. MEP Alexander Radwan, the rapporteur for the Capital Requirements Directive, is frantically trying to compress 887 amendments so it will pass out of the committee stage in mid-July. The trading book bits – which haven't been finalised by the Basel Committee yet, either – will be hastily tacked on before the CRD goes to the full EU Parliament.
Now, I am a huge fan of Basel II. It is a document that tries very hard to do something that is quite difficult. But this last-minute rush to push various bits through is no good. So far the Basel II process has been one of the most transparent and interactive rule-making processes the financial services industry has experienced.
Would it be so bad if the framework were delayed for another six months? Hardly. It will happen, but it should happen properly, with dignity and transparency. Basel II deserves more.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure