
Summertime, and the livin' ain't easy
EDITOR'S LETTER / ELLEN DAVIS
Indeed, US regulators discovered, after they did their own QIS4, that something is out of kilter, because capital plummeted for many banks. What to do? They refrained from publishing the draft US regulatory rules and picked up the hotline to Brussels.
But things aren't much easier there. MEP Alexander Radwan, the rapporteur for the Capital Requirements Directive, is frantically trying to compress 887 amendments so it will pass out of the committee stage in mid-July. The trading book bits – which haven't been finalised by the Basel Committee yet, either – will be hastily tacked on before the CRD goes to the full EU Parliament.
Now, I am a huge fan of Basel II. It is a document that tries very hard to do something that is quite difficult. But this last-minute rush to push various bits through is no good. So far the Basel II process has been one of the most transparent and interactive rule-making processes the financial services industry has experienced.
Would it be so bad if the framework were delayed for another six months? Hardly. It will happen, but it should happen properly, with dignity and transparency. Basel II deserves more.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates
Bankers call for overhaul of EBA stress tests
Support for multiple scenarios, but only if fixed assumptions and variables are scaled back
CFTC plan to relax MMF margin restriction sparks debate
Industry welcomes proposal to lift ban on repo-using funds as eligible IM, but some warn MMFs bring risks
Legal challenges loom for renewed US focus on Sifis
Lawyers say any FSOC attempt to designate systemic non-banks risks a repeat of MetLife case