Summertime, and the livin' ain't easy
Every summer, there seems to be a Basel II melodrama, and this year is no exception. Although the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: a revised framework last summer, it was by no means finished.
Indeed, US regulators discovered, after they did their own QIS4, that something is out of kilter, because capital plummeted for many banks. What to do? They refrained from publishing the draft US regulatory rules and picked up the hotline to Brussels.
But things aren't much easier there. MEP Alexander Radwan, the rapporteur for the Capital Requirements Directive, is frantically trying to compress 887 amendments so it will pass out of the committee stage in mid-July. The trading book bits – which haven't been finalised by the Basel Committee yet, either – will be hastily tacked on before the CRD goes to the full EU Parliament.
Now, I am a huge fan of Basel II. It is a document that tries very hard to do something that is quite difficult. But this last-minute rush to push various bits through is no good. So far the Basel II process has been one of the most transparent and interactive rule-making processes the financial services industry has experienced.
Would it be so bad if the framework were delayed for another six months? Hardly. It will happen, but it should happen properly, with dignity and transparency. Basel II deserves more.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Imminent US shake-up of LCR slated to include discount window
Adding Fed liquidity facility to bank regulation may help overcome stigma, raise lending capacity
French regulator wants permanent changes to EU’s output floor
Push for capital relief faces resistance from supervisors in Finland and the Netherlands
Council plans take Aquis, BME out of Esma oversight
German push to exempt Deutsche Börse catches three others, according to sources
Why watering down resolution plans is a bad idea
Bank failures are inevitable; banking crises are not
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
‘European SEC’ no silver bullet for growth
EU policymakers hope a single, centralised supervisor will help rev up Europe’s economy but critics are mustering
Permanent FRTB reforms seen as vital for IMA adoption
Temporary relief granted in June has done little to encourage internal model use in Europe
How to ensure the next Credit Suisse or SVB fails ‘well’
Regulators are planning changes to resolution rules after criticism that living wills were ignored in previous bank collapses