Summertime, and the livin' ain't easy
Every summer, there seems to be a Basel II melodrama, and this year is no exception. Although the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: a revised framework last summer, it was by no means finished.
Indeed, US regulators discovered, after they did their own QIS4, that something is out of kilter, because capital plummeted for many banks. What to do? They refrained from publishing the draft US regulatory rules and picked up the hotline to Brussels.
But things aren't much easier there. MEP Alexander Radwan, the rapporteur for the Capital Requirements Directive, is frantically trying to compress 887 amendments so it will pass out of the committee stage in mid-July. The trading book bits – which haven't been finalised by the Basel Committee yet, either – will be hastily tacked on before the CRD goes to the full EU Parliament.
Now, I am a huge fan of Basel II. It is a document that tries very hard to do something that is quite difficult. But this last-minute rush to push various bits through is no good. So far the Basel II process has been one of the most transparent and interactive rule-making processes the financial services industry has experienced.
Would it be so bad if the framework were delayed for another six months? Hardly. It will happen, but it should happen properly, with dignity and transparency. Basel II deserves more.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting