
SEC strikes deal with Madoff
Losses & Lawsuits
WASHINGTON, DC - Bernard Madoff has struck a deal with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to pay a civil fine and return cash to investors. Madoff has not yet been indicted on criminal charges, and is under house arrest in his Manhattan apartment. The civil agreement would have no bearing on criminal charges for the scandal-hit fund manager.
Madoff has agreed not to contest charges brought in a civil case by the SEC following his arrest in December 2008. By Madoff's own estimation, his alleged Ponzi scheme fraud is in the region of $50 billion.
Under the partial judgement deal, Madoff would not admit or deny the allegations in the SEC's complaint. However, the Washington Post states he would also be unable to deny the "basic facts" of the civil case: that he ran the Ponzi scheme and admitted that his investment business was a fraud to his sons. Madoff is alleged to have told his sons his firm - Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities - was "all one big lie" and "basically, a giant Ponzi scheme". The proposed agreement, which has been passed to a federal judge for review, will not affect the criminal case against him.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry confused by EU’s ‘bingo card’ clearing rules
Uncertainty over definition of representative trades in Emir active account requirement
FDIC scrutinised over move to cover all SVB deposits
Advisory panel questions whether guaranteeing uninsured deposits was necessary to prevent contagion
EBA seeks to tighten up uneven prudent value adjustments
Regulator to consult ‘soon’ on changes to improve consistency of capital deductions
Post-Brexit divergence puts EU subsidiaries on the rack
Banks face choice between higher staffing costs or over-engineered processes at UK headquarters
SEC criticised for belt-and-braces ban on volume-based pricing
Legal experts question need for rules to prevent firms disguising agency trades as proprietary
SEC expected to protect CRT in conflicts of interest rule
Decision could come as early as today; high hopes for credit risk transfer exemption
FRTB managers face hard facts about risk factors
There are ways to reduce the capital charges caused by NMRFs, but they come at a price
SEC official defends delayed dealer registration rule
Regulator says market should be treated like equities, but PTFs warn it will harm market liquidity