Rogue traders hit Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch
LONDON - Investment bank Morgan Stanley has suspended a suspected rogue trader who reportedly cost the bank $120 million (£60 million) by overpricing investments. Matthew Piper, a middle ranking credit trader working at the bank's London offices, was suspended a month ago and the incident has been reported to the UK Financial Services Authority. The news comes after rival US bank Merrill Lynch launched a separate investigation, probing the activities of one of its London-based equity derivatives traders on suspicion of inflating mark prices on single stock derivatives.
Merrill Lynch said its risk management system caught the suspicious trades, said to have taken place in April, while Morgan Stanley has clearly been less fortunate. The bank said it discovered the suspicious investments in the second half of May and believes that they had gone undetected for at least three months. It has disclosed a $120 million "negative adjustment" related to overstated valuations on some of the trader's positions. There are key similarities between the two cases. Both involved the repricing of difficult-to-value investments using mark-to-market models reliant upon highly illiquid markets.
These fresh trading incidents follow January's rogue trading scandal at Societe Generale and another investigation at Swiss bank Credit Suisse. Morgan Stanley's chief financial officer, Colm Kelleher, said the bank had "zero tolerance" of such behaviour.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint