Level 3 committees respond to Commission
Cebs, Cesr and Ceiops have replied to the European Commission's views on future EU supervision
LONDON, PARIS & FRANKFURT - The three European Union (EU) Level 3 committees have responded to the European Commission's views on the future supervision of the EU banking, securities and insurance sectors in the wake of the Larosière report's call for EU supervisory overhaul.
The London-based Committee of European Banking Supervisors (Cesr), the Parisian Committee of European Securities Regulators (Cesr), and the Frankfurt-housed Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (Ceiops) broadly backed the high-level recommendations of Jacques de Larosière.
The 14-page joint statement by the three Lamfalussy committees emphasises the need for a harmonised set of core rules; the establishment of colleges as core structures for cross-border supervision; the need for a coherent framework for crisis resolution; and the need for increased and further formalised co-ordination among the sector regulators and supervisors.
The joint response can be read here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
European banks search for consensus on credit spread risk
New EBA guidelines spawn diverging interpretations of which products must be assessed for CSRBB
Dutch regulator in new push on algo manipulation
AFM teams up with Oxford Uni academics to develop data models that will identify “harmful” collusion in automated trading
Fed relief plan for G-Sib agency clearing welcomed
Rollback may revive interest in European FCM model, as principal clearing still treated punitively
Indian initial margin launch brings operational headaches
Conglomerates with multiple entities trading derivatives pose compliance challenges for dealers
Fed’s new liquidity rule spells more pain for regional banks
Limit on HTM assets follows move to deduct unrealised losses from capital buffers
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
SEC streamlines overhaul of stock trading rules
Tick size and access fee rules simplified from first draft, but Peirce still questions rationale
Supervisors use generative AI to tame ‘chaotic’ data
Officials merge credit databases with unstructured reports to sharpen bank oversight, explains Banco de España ex-deputy