
The Bear Stearns Blues continue
LOSSES & LAWSUITS
NEW YORK - Shareholders at Bear Stearns are still counting the cost of its shock sell-off to JP Morgan. Outrage from Bear Stearns staff over the Fed-brokered secret deal swiftly led rival JP Morgan to issue a five-fold rise of the initial $2 share price offered to $10 to stave off legal action. Bear Stearns' 14,150 directors and employees are understood to own 38.7% of the bank's shares. The revised deal values Wall Street's fifth-largest investment bank at around $2.1 billion, compared to $236 million under the first offer.
The new offer is still 88% down on share price last month - representing a loss for the bank's shareholder staff of about $3 billion. Freefalling subprime stock, compounded by the credit draught, took the 85-year-old Bear Stearns to the brink of bankruptcy. Other big losers are UK billionaire Joe Lewis, who bought 11 million shares in the firm last year, chairman James Cayne who reportedly owns 5.6 million shares in the bank, and chief executive Alan Schwartz who owns a further 1.03 million shares. The sale was co-ordinated with the US Federal Reserve, which gave approval after helping to provide $200 million emergency funding to Bear Stearns only days before. The Fed has agreed to provide credit for up to $30 billion of Bear Stearns' struggling assets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates