Trigon Pensions fined for failing to monitor subsidiary
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Trigon Pensions £10,500, for failing to monitor advisers effectively at its appointed representative, Trigon Financial Services (TFS).
According to the FSA, TFS did not record sufficient customer inform- ation, and was therefore unable to demonstrate the quality of the advice that was given.
It also failed to implement and follow an adequate training and competence scheme for advisers, and its suitability letters were inadequate.
"Trigon's failures were serious and mirrored some of the main failings we found during our work into the process of giving financial advice last year," says Jonathan Phelan, head of retail enforcement at the FSA.
"At that time we identified the key areas that firms needed to address, which included training and competence, the production of clear suitability and controls for monitoring the advice process... A firm's management is responsible for ensuring it follows FSA rules, and we will take appropriate action from the various supervisory and enforcement tools we have available where failings are found."
The FSA reviewed 100 firms. The results, published in July 2006, found many examples of good practice, but the work identified substantial failings in an unacceptable number of firms.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities