Podcast: Abi-Jaber and Li on a ‘sticky’ volatility problem
The pair discuss their model to jointly capture Vix, SPX and SSR
Developing a model that jointly calibrates options on Vix and SPX while generating consistent dynamics between spot price and volatility has long exercised quants.
Early studies proposed various ways to solve the joint calibration problem, using rough volatility models, jump processes or proceeding by interpolation, with mixed success on tractability and accuracy. More recent works have improved accuracy and speed.
A more neglected part of the problem involves the skew stickiness ratio (SSR), a quantity introduced by Lorenzo Bergomi that measures how much at-the-money implied volatility moves when the underlying asset’s spot price moves.
Most modern model specifications don’t capture SSR consistently. That means two models taking a snapshot at the same Vix and SPX smiles might project two very different forward volatilities, consequently leading banks to adopt different hedging strategies.
Having a reliable handle on SSR greatly helps efficient hedging.
Eduardo Abi-Jaber (pictured above, right), professor of applied mathematics at École Polytechnique, and Shaun Li, quant strategist on the exotic equity derivatives desk at Morgan Stanley, discuss their solution to this problem in the latest episode of Quantcast.
“S&P 500 options exhibit a steep negative skew, at least for short maturities. At the same time, Vix options have a pronounced upward slope smile,” says Abi-Jaber. “Finding a model that is capable of reproducing both features while reproducing realistic spot-vol dynamics is known to be very difficult ... and this was the starting point of Shaun’s PhD,” he adds, referring to his role as Li’s PhD supervisor prior to his move to Morgan Stanley.
Li explains why this matters. Even the computation of Greek measures, like the delta of a position, may give different results depending on whether SSR is in the so-called sticky-delta regime or in the sticky-strike regime. “To better control and understand the P&L it is very important to get the SSR right, because it can lead to very different hedging strategies,” Li says.
The pair describe their model as a two-factor quintic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model. In essence, it is a degree-five polynomial of the sum of two random processes driven by the same Brownian motion.
As for the quintic term, the authors explain that the choice of a degree-five polynomial is a result of the search for the simplest possible model to describe all the intended features. A degree five captures the necessary complexity, and there’s a structural, mathematical reason for the degree to be an odd number (meaning four and six aren’t suitable), which relates to the process to preserve the properties required for financial problems.
The pair’s two-factor model builds on a previous, one-factor version that Abi-Jaber and Li authored with Camille Illand of BNP Paribas Asset Management. With two factors, the model can capture the full volatility surface, while the one-factor version could only describe short maturities, up to three months, Abi-Jaber says.
Looking ahead, Abi-Jaber plans to extend the quintic model to include path-dependency, or the inclusion of memory effects in volatility modelling.
Index:
00:00 Introduction
01:30 Background on the paper and collaboration
07:55 Quintic – why a five-degree polynomial is appropriate
15:40 Implementation and challenges
24:00 Future of volatility modelling with path signatures
28:46 Next projects
To hear the full interview, listen in the player above, or download. Future podcasts in our Quantcast series will be uploaded to Risk.net. You can also visit the main page to access all tracks, or go to Spotify, Amazon Music or Apple Podcasts to listen and subscribe.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Views
Markets perceive the future in very distorted ways
Discounting paradigms should adapt to be more realistic, says Jean-Philippe Bouchaud
In the age of GenAI, why do we still need good models?
Jean-Philippe Bouchaud says models can guide artificial intelligence through regime shifts and away from overfitting
Beyond epicycles: models must describe markets, not just fit them
Modelling needs to embrace complexity in volatility patterns, says Jean-Philippe Bouchaud
A smooth fit for complex volatility surfaces
Quant shows a new way to capture implied vol with optimisers
Podcast: Gordon Lee on how junior quants can go from newbie to MVP
Prioritising tasks and setting boundaries are key to career progression, says BNY’s head quant
Markets never forget: the lasting impression of square-root impact
Jean-Philippe Bouchaud argues trade flows have a large and long-term effect on asset prices
Podcast: Pietro Rossi on credit ratings and volatility models
Stochastic approaches and calibration speed improve established models in credit and equity
Degree of Influence 2025: Derivatives pricing dominates; quants don’t follow the AI herd
Rates and volatility modelling, as well as trade execution, top quants’ priorities