Basel and Fed G-Sib methods pose dual test to US banks
Different emphasis of rival frameworks could frustrate bank efforts to reduce systemic risk
The two methodologies used by US regulators to gauge banks’ systemic threat weight their risks differently, complicating the ability of firms to reduce or cast off applicable capital add-ons, a Risk Quantum analysis shows.
US banks are subject to two methods of measuring their systemic riskiness: Method 1, based on the Basel Committee framework; and Method 2, drafted by the Federal Reserve. Both
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk Quantum
Top US banks’ AFS markdowns reverse sharply in Q1
Aggregate unrealised losses jump 130% after five-quarter recovery
Private credit disclosures leave more questions than answers
Muddled metrics and scattergun reporting hinder comparison of US lenders
AmEx posts highest LCR among US banks on return to disclosure
Retail and contractual flows dominate 30-day stress scenario
UBS set for highest G-Sib CET1 minimum under Swiss proposal
Effective CET1 minimum would clear 13% on foreign-participant deduction
Euro area NBFI derivatives spike as ECB flags systemic risks
Cross-border claims surge 32% in Q4, with ECB report suggesting activity concentrated among few G-Sibs
Cross-border bank credit growth hits 17-year high
Euro credit to emerging markets grows 12%, outpacing dollar
Wall Street giants rack up VAR breaches
Goldman hit hardest as JP Morgan, BofA and Morgan Stanley also exceed model forecasts in Q1
Surcharge of the light-touch brigade
US reform of G-Sib surcharge goes well beyond simple update
