Banks turn to synthetic derivatives to cut initial margin

Options-based instruments can halve initial margin for some non-cleared products, say dealers

Banks say big reductions in IM can be achieved by using synthetic swaps

At least two dealers have turned to so-called synthetic derivatives to reduce the initial margin (IM) required for their interest rate and foreign exchange portfolios, with estimated margin savings of up to 50% on some positions.

New margin rules require large dealers to post initial margin against new non-cleared derivatives positions. This has created a problem for the trading of instruments such as swaptions, which are non-cleared but hedged with cleared swaps.

Under the industry’s agreed standard initial margin model (Simm), the more directional a portfolio is, the more initial margin needs to be posted, so some banks have looked to create non-cleared synthetic swaps – a long swaptions call and a short put – with the same counterparty to mimic the cleared hedge. This offsets the directionality of the swaptions position and reduces initial margin in the process.

“Swaptions have a big contribution to IM and they are delta-hedged with cleared swaps. So instead, one can use calls minus puts to reduce the IM,” says a credit valuation adjustment trader at a European bank. The trader says a 20–30% reduction will be possible by using synthetic swaps to offset IM.

Once the IM is offset, the original delta, which is the sensitivity of the position’s value to changes in the underlying, needs to be reinstated via another cleared swap. The cleared swap does require IM to be posted to the clearing house but the overall amount is less than at the start of the trade.

“We don’t want to change the overall risk profile,” says a managing director at a second European bank. “So you would take synthetic swaps created through swaptions. And then you would reinstate the risk through a swap. The swap is clearable so it will not contribute to Simm IM,” he says.

This technique is also being used for forex products, with at least one European bank using synthetic forex forwards to offset initial margin on non-cleared forex options, forex swaps and non-deliverable forex forwards (NDFs) that haven’t been backloaded to clearing. Similar to swaptions, banks use a combination of forex option puts and calls to offset the forex derivatives position with a counterparty and replace the risk with a deliverable forex forward, which is not subject to the non-cleared margin rules and so doesn’t attract IM.

What we are doing now is trying to develop various Simm IM minimisation tools ahead of the situation when it becomes really large

A managing director at a European bank

“Our overall portfolio across all dealers is probably well hedged. So if we add a synthetic forward to the Simm IM portfolio, we have to reinstate the same amount of risk through different types of trade which are not subject to Simm IM. It would be deliverable forwards in this case,” says the managing director at the second European bank.

The bank has been using synthetic forex derivatives to reduce IM since the first quarter of this year. The managing director says funding costs could potentially be reduced by up to a half, depending on the initial margin profile of the portfolio being optimised.

The margin rules for non-cleared derivatives, which are being implemented in phases that started in September last year, require in-scope entities to post initial and variation margin when trading with each other. More than 20 large dealers with over $3 trillion notional in non-cleared derivatives across the group were caught by the first phase last year, and six more banks are set to start posting IM from September 1.

The managing director at the second European bank says strategies to optimise IM are going to become more important as more banks are required to post margin as the rules are phased in.

“IM for non-centrally cleared derivatives is material. It is not extremely large right now… but as more and more counterparties will be covered by [the] margin reform regulation, the amount of IM that we will have to post to our counterparties will grow and at some point it will become really, really material,” he says.

“So what we are doing now is trying to develop various Simm IM minimisation tools ahead of the situation when it becomes really large,” he adds.

The move is the latest attempt by banks to cut IM for non-cleared trades. Risk.net reported in April that around half of the major banks were decomposing index positions into their constituent parts to allow for better offsetting under the Simm. The majority of the interdealer inflation swap and NDF markets also moved to clearing in September to reduce the IM requirements on new trades.

Non-cleared margin – a timeline

• Regulation

Asian buy side faces non-cleared margin currency penalty

• 31 Oct 2017

• Markets

Industry hails potential US relaxation of margin timing rules

• 18 Oct 2017

• Markets

Compliance fears slow use of synthetic swaps to cut IM

• 07 Sep 2017

• Markets

Banks warn clients of possible unwinds as VM deadline nears

• 21 Aug 2017

• Markets

VM repapering exercise ‘a swing and a miss’

• 09 May 2017

• Risk management

Banks seek escape from inter‑affiliate margin burden

• 28 Apr 2017