Compliance fears slow use of synthetic swaps to cut IM

Dealers want firmer guidance on whether technique to slash margin costs contravenes clearing mandate

Back in 2012, when banks were under intense pressure to reduce the capital footprint of their swaps books, there was some buzz about a new optimisation service for non-cleared derivatives from TriOptima.

Called triBalance, the service worked by identifying webs of new overlay trades that would offset bilateral exposure within a network of banks, with the exposure then being replaced using cleared swaps. It was ingenious, but a fatal flaw meant it did not take off in the way it could have; the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: