Stress tests ignored CRE threat – Congress
US banks face hundreds of billions of dollars in losses on commercial real estate loans, a danger that was missed by the Capital Adequacy Program (Cap) stress tests in early 2009.
The Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, in a report issued in January, predicted that banks could see up to $300 billion in losses on their commercial real estate portfolios, and warned the threat this poses to the US financial system was completely overlooked by the Cap.
Between now and 2014, “$1.4 trillion in commercial real estate loans will reach the end of their terms. Nearly half are at present underwater”, the report said.
The panel pointed out the bulk of commercial real estate losses would come after the expiry of the Tarp – already being wound down and set to expire on October 3. It warned “the size of the commercial real estate market means that its disruption could also have ripple effects throughout the broader economy, prolonging the financial crisis”.
In addition, although the bulk of the losses will come in 2011 and later, the stress tests only examined banks’ capital adequacy under two stress scenarios up to the end of 2010. Furthermore, the stress tests looked only at 19 major banks; while the heaviest burden of the commercial real estate collapse will fall on small and medium-sized lenders, who have half the total system exposure to commercial real estate, despite having only 15% of total assets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London