Asic takes over regulation of exchange trading
The Australian government has ended self-regulation of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), making the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Asic) responsible for supervising trading on Australian stock markets from the third quarter of 2010.
Asic will take over responsibility from ASX and the independent Disciplinary Tribunal. ASX, however, will keep the authority for the supervision of companies listed on the licensed financial markets.
"Asic is now closer to the market, more accessible, flexible and able to take emerging trends into account more quickly," said Tony D'Aloisio, Asic's chairman, when explaining Asic's suitability for the role.
The change will see Asic working with ASX and industry bodies such as the Australian Financial Markets Association and the Securities and Derivatives Industry Association. A more detailed explanation of the execution of this switch will be provided once the legislative framework is in place, the Australian Treasury added.
The new mechanism will put ASX on a more equal regulatory footing with its aspiring rivals. Three companies have applied for licences to trade in the Australian market. The Axe consortium is backed by the New Zealand NZX exchange, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs JB Were, Macquarie and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, along with Australian brokers CommSec. US marketplace Liquidnet and European trading platform Chi-X have also applied.
See also: Australia lifts ban on short selling
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say