Introduction
Calls for greater credit derivatives regulation are gathering pace. David Paterson, state governor of New York, announced on September 22 that parts of the credit default swap (CDS) market will be regulated from January 2009. The next day, Christopher Cox, chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, called on the US Senate Banking Committee to "provide in statute the authority to regulate these products to enhance investor protection and ensure the operation of fair and orderly markets".
Given the huge amounts of cash used to support failing financial institutions in the US, UK and Europe, it now seems almost unthinkable politicians and regulators will not respond by demanding greater regulation and oversight of the banking sector.
Nonetheless, CDS traders are aghast at the news their market could face greater regulation. The CDS market, claim dealers, has worked well in difficult conditions and allowed investors to hedge exposures and take positions in credits for which there are no liquid underlying bonds. They say moves to regulate the sector in the US could push the business to other jurisdictions.
The derivatives industry has developed strong lobbying skills over the past two decades, which stood it in good stead during a spate of losses in 1994, blamed on the mis-selling of derivatives (Orange County, Procter & Gamble and Gibson Greetings). While the industry successfully campaigned against greater regulation in the derivatives market then, it may now find more resistance from politicians, determined to show they are standing up to Wall Street.
Nick Sawyer, Editor.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities