Editor's Letter
As Credit went to press, the financial press was abuzz, yet again, with the question of regulation. Timothy Geithner, president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, is the latest to enter the fray, insisting in a speech to the Economic Club of New York that "globally active" financial institutions must operate within a single framework providing "stronger consolidated supervision, with appropriate requirements for capital and liquidity".
Clearly some kind of regulatory change is required in the light of the turmoil in credit. This is especially evident in the UK given the debacle resulting from the tripartite regulatory system's failure to contain Northern Rock, and Geithner - whose awareness of the need for central banks to act decisively is matched by his concern about moral hazard - is well placed to suggest what forms it might take. Yet reform in the wake of obvious failings, however necessary, will not equip regulators to prevent, or even predict, the next crisis in the financial system.
No-one I've spoken to has ever suggested that regulators can ever be anything other than one step - at least - behind the markets. This is due to the nature of the system: bankers are, often, paid to innovate, while regulators are there to ensure they do so fairly. It's also a question of personnel: for example, many senior market participants believe some enhanced oversight of the rating agencies is desirable, but who would suggest that anyone at a regulator is capable of suggesting even the most basic methodology changes?
Tim Geithner's views are essential, but we need to hear more from the banks and their clients about how they want the rules of engagement to change in the wake of nearly a year of turmoil.
Unless they are more vocal, the initiative will remain with the regulators.
Matthew Attwood.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management