German regulator investigates Volkswagen shares manipulation
The German financial regulator, BaFin, has started a formal investigation into market manipulation of Volkswagen's shares after they quadrupled in value and then fell by almost half over a three day period. BaFin said the probe could lead to administrative or criminal sanctions.
On October 26, Porsche announced it held 42.6% of ordinary shares and 31.5% in cash-settled options on ordinary shares to hedge against price risks, representing an effective total stake of 74.1% in Volkswagen. This was more than the 35.14% shareholding Porsche had disclosed on September 16.
If Porsche settles its options, the company would receive the difference between the Volkswagen share price and the underlying strike price in cash. Porsche said it would then buy Volkswagen shares at their market price. Porsche intends to increase its stake in Volkswagen to up to 75% in 2009, to achieve a controlling interest in the company.
Porsche's larger than expected holdings, along with the German state of Lower Saxony's stake of 20.1%, meant that there was an effective free float of only 5.8%. This presented a squeeze for short sellers as they scrambled to cover positions from a much smaller pool of shares than they previously thought.
Volkswagen's equity price rose to €1005.01 on October 28 from €210.52 at the end of last week. It then plummeted back down again to close at €512 on October 29.
As a result of these price movements, German stock exchange Deutsche Börse lowered Volkswagen's weighting in the Dax to 10% from 27% on October 28. Porsche said on October 29 it would sell up to 5% of Volkswagen's shares so that short sellers could fulfil their delivery obligations without causing "further market distortions", which caused heavy losses for them earlier this week.
Investors have complained about the lack of transparency around options positions. Under German law, cash-settled options do not need to be disclosed to shareholders because they do not result in an entitlement to acquire shares. BaFin said that as a supervisory authority it does not have the remit to impose stricter disclosure requirements; this would instead be an issue for the country's legislature.
Porsche blames the short sellers for creating price distortions and dismisses any claims of wrong doing on its part. "Porsche denies all responsibility for these market distortions and for the resulting risks to which the short sellers have exposed themselves," said the company on October 29.
The company claimed it had complied with all the applicable capital markets law provisions and it was not active in the market during the recent share price movements.
"Allegations of price manipulation by Porsche are therefore without any foundation whatsoever," Porsche stated.
See also: MF Global head steps down after Lehman losses
IMF, EU and World Bank feed Hungary $25.1 billion bailout
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities