Senators move to establish stronger federal oversight of energy markets
A group of US senators yesterday introduced legislation, called the Energy Market Oversight Act, that seeks to restore the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) authority over online and bilateral energy trades and give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Ferc) powers to investigate and punish possible instances of fraud and manipulation in the over-the-counter energy markets.
The act is, in effect, a resurrection of last year’s Feinstein-led proposals to impose tighter control of the OTC markets in the wake of Enron’s collpase and the California power crisis. Her proposals were defeated in a routine procedural vote in April 2002 that required 60 affirmative senate votes for her legislation to advance.
“The legislation would close a loophole that allows energy trades to take place online with no transparency, no record keeping and no audit trail – with no federal oversight to guard against fraud and manipulation,” Feinstein said.
In 2000, Congress passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which essentially exempted online and bilateral energy and metals trading from regulatory oversight. This loophole, the senators argue, allowed energy companies – such as EnronOnline – to trade billions of dollars worth of energy derivatives with no regulatory oversight. Their proposed legislation would increase notice, reporting, bookkeeping and other transparency requirements, and require energy companies to maintain sufficient capital to cover trades commensurate with risks.
The bill also seeks to prohibit 'wash trades', a practice that gained notoriety last year as a number of firms were found to be trading the same asset at the same price to boost trading volume figures. If the legislation passes, wash trades would be subject to civil penalties for each violation, and those found guilty could be imprisoned for up to 10 years. In December 2002, a former El Paso natural gas trader was indicted for reporting fictitious natural gas transactions to an industry publication, and Dynegy, Duke, El Paso, Reliant, CMS, and Williams have all admitted to engaging in wash trades.
The legislation also seeks to authorise Ferc to fine companies that do not comply with requests for information. This is the same authority that the Securities Exchange Commission has over financial institutions.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint